I AM NOT ACCUSING MCALLISTER.
So, I haven't looked for the "leaked"" episode. I seem to think it is probably real though. Why would they film and edit a whole episode, just to leak it and set us on a wild goose chase? Now, if they did do that, it probably is the most elaborate rouse in television history. Just want to see what you all think...
Click "plausible" if you believe the "leaked" episode is the real deal.
Click "unlikely" if you believe the leaked episode is fake.
Anyone think they wouldn't show McAllister (assuming it is him) in the promo? Doesn't that kind of ruin the big reveal?
Just a thought...tell me what you all think.
Jane always says Red John thinks of himself as an artist. We know his is also narcissistic. Brett Partridge is at all of the Red John and copycat Red John killing sites. Wouldn't it make sense for him to be there so he could "admire his work" and see other people's reactions? Not only that but he would be around Jane all the time. This way he can get a feel for how much he knows, and how close he is to discovering who he really is.
Let's just assume for the purpose of this argument that Partridge is Red John, and that he did fake his death. It looks like Bertrum, Smith and McAllister are part of this conspiracy. Also assuming that Red John is the leader of the group, it would have been simple for one of them to be in the house while Partridge appeared dead. Faking his death could be Partridge's way of trying to make other people look suspicious, and take some of the heat off of himself.
Heller said Red John killed Brett Partridge. Does this mean he literally killed him, or he killed the alias known as Brett Partridge?
Did anyone notice in "Red John's Rules" that when the assistant asked Partridge, "he (Red John) killed just recently didn't he?" Patridge then got very serious and replied with, "no, that was an internal issue. Lorelei Martins was one of his own people; it doesn't count."
I found this to be a strange but also interesting response. Red John thinks of himself as an artist. He takes pride in his victims, and due to Lorelei digging into the Miranda issue, killed her because of that. As she was one of his people, he might not have counted this. If Partridge is indeed Red John, he would feel the need to correct the assistant when he brought up the fact that Red John had killed recently. If he is not Red John, wouldn't a simple, "yes, he murdered one of his own people" suffice?
I've seen a lot of theories about Lorelei not actually being dead, BUT, for the sake of this idea, let's pretend she definitely is dead. What do you all think of Patridge's statements?