Someone else who thinks that Gale Bertram being Red John is too obvious.
Definitely an accomplice, but not Red John. Why would Bruno Heller make
it so easy for the viewers.
We can speculate a lot of who is Red
John, weather Partridge died or dint die, or if it is the mentalist Bret
Stiles who doesnt fit the description Harker gave, maybe its Bob
Kirkland but on the other hand he wasnt recognized by those who knew Red
John etc. My point is that those seven on the list, any of them could
be Red John. The writers are of course very skillful and therefore gave
them abilities that could point them out as Red John but also deny them.
I think its not a good idea to try to find who Red John is by searching
the clues that has been told. I believe the answer is in the text "he
is mar". This is the one of the clues that has been forgotten or not
talked about. There may be more similar clues but i cant think of them
right now. I also believe that when Red John is revealed, it will make
perfect sense.
Gale Bertram calling Jane "the wonder boy" is on
big clue, but Bertram doesnt fit the physical description at all. Brett
Stiles and Jane are both mentalist but Stiles doesnt fit the description
at all. I havent even begun with the voice that only suits Partridge.
"he is mar"
mar = ocean in spanish
Written fro the left or right maybe give the text from a different spelling. Maybe reversed?
Maybe the text isnt finished.
Anyway even this doesnt make sense, why would Red John not fully kill his victims...
I
am perfectly happy with waiting and see till episode 8 and I think no
one will have the right to say "I told you so" because of the fact that
every theory could easily be countered.
BTW Lorelei is a beauty. I hope she returns..
