Who is Red John?

Theories of Dark-Jane (3)

I've seen the leaked episode a couple of times now, and managed to reconcile that McAllister is RJ. 

However two things don't fit:

1) It says it was filmed in 2012

2) It is also called Episode 7564 (not 5608 as it should have been after the last one was called 5607)

Lastly, for all the people so proudly proclaiming it is the real episode - we were all desperate to see the past few episodes, each one of them was big on their own this season so far. Yet how come nobody on here managed to spring a leak for any of them? Especially the episode that was missed the US due to the football? I don't remember seeing any CBS website links to uncut/unedited versions of that on here. It just seems a little too convenient to have this episode show up five days before the real one. Who even leaked it in the first place? Does anyone know? Was it even leaked on this website first? And if so, why didn't we get any of the other episodes like this?

(All the magazines have been writing previews about all the other episodes too, so I won't accept the excuse that this was the most important episode, so it was put up on the website for previewing to the press)

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

Believe me, I'm a RJ is Partridge guy and am eagerly anticipating the reveal. 

However it's sooo clear that there is a complete alternate storyline going on in The Great Red Dragon, that we aren't shown the full details of as yet. 

I just wanted to point out this very important scene where Patrick goes and kneels in church. Just after he kneels, the camera pans to a painting on the wall which shows a man with a beard holding a book with the Roman Numerals I through to VII (7). 

The man is holding up three fingers with his right hand - suggesting the number 3. 

This makes me wonder could this be Heller's way of indirectly referencing the seven suspects? And on the original list, the 3rd name read out by Lorelei is Haffner...

I wouldn't be thrilled at this outcome as I want it to be Partridge, but this seems like a clue that is hard to ignore.

Please see the comments section for the link to the photo from that scene. 

What say? 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4PRYQ19FmNqMkZHbzF3MUh6QWM/edit?usp=sharing

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely

The reason I follow the Mentalist (aside from how legendary Patrick Jane is), is because from the very first episode, Bruno Heller has said he has always known how the final episode of the show would transpire. He said at the very beginning that Jane vs Red John is the overarching storyline and this would not come to a close until the very final chapter of the show. Therefore I am very confident that he has planned pretty much every Red John related episode with knowledge of who Red John is from the outset, just as we know who Jane is. And I firmly believe Simon Baker knows who Red John is, and has known this from when he was approached with the script and signed on to play Patrick Jane. For me, Red John's significance would dwindle considerably if it turned out to be some random guy/girl we meet later in seasons 3 to 5 (e.g. Reede Smith/Haffner/McAllister etc). And I am convinced directly as a result of that, that the show's significance would dwindle too. Therefore, I am convinced that Red John is someone we have met in the very first episode of the show that both casual and religious followers of the show would remember. However for a show of this type to maintain it's casual followers, said person would need to be a character who is present as little as possible, but just enough for the audience to go recall immediately when Red John is finally revealed to us. The only recurring characters from the first episode, present until even now (in what I am convinced is likely to be the final season of the Mentalist if ratings dip) are: Jane, Lisbon, Cho, Rigsby, Van Pelt, Minelli (though we have not seen him for some time now) and Brett Partridge. 

Of these, the character that fits this criterion is Brett Partridge (aside from all the other parameters pointing directly at him - e.g. being the correct age, height, build, the same voice, links within the CBI, morbid fascination with murders and crimes, etc)

I really badly have always wanted the identity of Red John to be Jane, Lisbon, Van Pelt or Cho/Rigsby and for this to be revealed in the very final episode of the entire show after we think the threat of Red John has finally been put to the grave a few episodes earlier. If this were my show, the final scene of the show's finale for me would be when all is supposedly well with "Red John" dead and everyone living happily ever after, us finding out that Jane really was Red John all along and the madness will continue because Jane has (as said in the opening credits of every show in Season 1) been "A Master Manipulator". However, that is just my dark and morbid way of thinking about this - as the boldest TV show in the last decade with the ultimate final twist, going out in a blaze of glory. Unfortunately, Bruno Heller has said a few times now that it is not Jane - therefore this shall reside in my imagination... for now.

However, it is unlikely any TV show will be as bold as that, even one of the calibre of The Mentalist. Additionally, Bruno Heller has said that there will be a little disappointment after we find out who Red John is. After watching S5 finale and S6 premiere closely and repeatedly I am now forced to entertain the most probable alternative - 


It is now more clearly obvious than ever that Red John is Brett Partridge...


He "faked" his death very cleverly in front of us and Lisbon in purposefully poor lighting and as she was distracted by that mysterious sink, she was simply swiped from behind by Partridge. It all makes sense. Even if we get to see Partridge's dead body next week, it will only be a very short glimpse. Had Partridge been "killed" off in any other episode than the premiere this season, my theory would have been very poor and I would not be posting this now. The very fact that he has been "killed" off in the season premiere is incredibly telling. Most of us will now forget him completely whilst other suspects/innocents are being murdered and Jane hunts for Lisbon - until the episode we have all been waiting for arrives and Red John is revealed as Partridge, who was alive all along - this is classic storytelling...

The obvious reasons:
1) He was located at the scene of the "anonymous" tip-off on both GPS and in person
2) His presence was extremely notable in both S5 finale and now the premiere
3) This is the perfect Bruno Heller foil - the real Red John would take himself off the list as soon as possible - faking death in the opening episode is the perfect way

Not so obvious but perhaps more pertinent:
1) Remember the show's premiere episode way back in 2008. Where we walk in to the fake Red John murder scene and are introduced to Brett Partridge whom Jane describes as a Ghoul, mentions the classic line "He irks me. He is irksome" and says if he doesn't "get off on fan gory, then I (Jane) am Britney Spears". Remember that demonstration by Partridge of how Red John draws the bloody smiley on the wall? He used his right hand. Now watch the final scene where Lisbon's face is being painted. We are to assume this is Red John wearing a black glove on his right hand, standing to the right of Lisbon's (clearly unconscious only, not dead or bleeding, body) and painting her face with his right hand. In exactly the same way Partridge did it. Please go back and watch how Partridge details the way Red John paints the face. Watch them side by side. The similarity is impossible to ignore. 



More to come... 

..
U


.

Argue on this theory or rate it.
plausible
unlikely
Follow us on