Who is Red John?

Theory #15361 • by MentalistFan1

Suspect

Thomas McAllister

Thomas McAllister
Suspected in 1k+ theories

ARGUMENTATION

Plot holes aside (terrible editing, perhaps even writing)- the final showdown with Red John was actually smart. It is a relief to see a show bucking the trend (read: torrent) of anti-hero veneration. Yes, the attractive, sickeningly interesting antagonist is interesting as a change, not as the norm. The exposure of Red John as a "mortal-after-all", played very well by X.B., was more than I could ask for. Personally, having followed the show since Day 1, I kinda expected a big, mindless, mythology-based finale- Deathly Hallows Part II style, and, after watching the ep. for the second time, am weirdly glad I didn't get that.  
HOWEVER: Plot Holes and weak writing. The whole season (and esp. this episode up until halfway through), came across as forced. Like many on this site, I think the RJ storyline should've ended with Carter. Since that hasn't happened, oh well- I guess The Mentalist has to move on. The diff. is, back then, they did not explain much, but the clever build-up of the finale more than made up for the "out-of-the-blue" RJ. Here, a terrific showdown, were RJ is finally downed by his ego (and Jane's simple thinking, ironically) and the brilliant X.B. and Baker, are all smudged by a terrible build-up. 

So, while I was happy with the conclusion, the episode as a whole was let down by the bad build-up, plot-holes, leaks and etc. I am however looking forward to the RJ-free Mentalist, since Heller and co. don't have a convoluted, drawn out plot to satisfy now. Hopefully they won't create another one right away. 

As for those hating the episode for making RJ come across as weak- well then. The Mentalist= PJ, the protagonist, hero of this tale. RJ was supposed to be exposed as pathetic (as all villains are). That's Patrick's triumph over RJ- reducing him to a terrified mortal like himself. I believe you have all fallen into the trap of RJ-worship, while what we should have been anticipating (from the hyperbolic build-up I despised) was RJ being stripped of his mask and halo, down to his flesh- and he's an old-fashioned criminal, no nuancing or grey-areas. And that was refreshing to me, and disappointing to those who believed in a Heath Ledger style Joker kind of RJ. This is the ultimate disappointment Heller talked about: criminals are just that: puny humans with over-sized egos and undersized balls. If you don't like the philosophy of the show's creator, maybe you shouldn't watch. 

How do you find this theory?
plausible
unlikely
comments powered by Disqus
Follow us on